Why this comparison comes up often
Clients often want non-injection alternatives while still targeting stubborn areas. Cavitation is commonly discussed in that context.
Core differences
| Topic | Aqualyx | Cavitation | | --- | --- | --- | | Method | Injection pathway | Ultrasound session pathway | | Typical planning | Dosage by area | Session package by area | | Use case | Localised contouring goals | Non-invasive contour support | | Review approach | Staged review | Session progression review |
How to choose safely
Prioritise this order:
- Suitability and contraindication screening
- Anatomical fit for the target area
- Realistic timeline and review plan
- Budget and session commitment
Cost logic comparison
- Aqualyx: usually priced per ml
- Cavitation: usually priced as session packages
Helpful links:
What to avoid
Avoid choosing solely on:
- A single social-media testimonial
- Promise-based marketing language
- One-size-fits-all claims
Internal links
Final note
Aqualyx and cavitation are different tools. The right choice is based on suitability, treatment goal, and a plan you can realistically complete.
